From jp@smets.com Thu, 12 Aug 1999 13:44:47 +0200
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 13:44:47 +0200
From: Jean-Paul Smets jp@smets.com
Subject: [Patents] Rome treaty - article 100A
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
  boundary="------------877E53571CF6BC02E04F0949"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------877E53571CF6BC02E04F0949
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I just found the following : the directive prepared by the European
Commission with article 100A of the Rome treaty as base.
(read http://europa.eu.int/abc/obj/treaties/en/entr6d05.htm)

This article includes the following paragraph "The Commission, in its
proposals envisaged in paragraph 1 concerning health, safety,
environmental protection and consumer protection, will take as a base a
high level of protection."

There are a few loopholes to be exploited on the legal side.

Safety: because software patents are an incentive not publish the
source code, and because publishing the source code is good for safety
as it has been shown by Y2K, then any harmonization directive should try
to restrict software patents in order to reach a higher level of
protection regarding safety.

Consumer: software patents could be used to create artificial
interoperability issues which could be very damageable to consummers.
Any harmonization directive should try to restrict the use of patents on
software interfaces in order to reach a higher level of protection
regarding consumers.

JPS.
--------------877E53571CF6BC02E04F0949
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=iso-8859-1;
 name="jp.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Description: Card for Jean-Paul Smets
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="jp.vcf"

YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46U21ldHM7SmVhbi1QYXVsCnRlbDtjZWxsOiszMy0oMCk2NjIgMDUg
NzYgMTQKeC1tb3ppbGxhLWh0bWw6RkFMU0UKdXJsOnd3dy5zbWV0cy5jb20KYWRyOjs7Ozs7
Owp2ZXJzaW9uOjIuMQplbWFpbDtpbnRlcm5ldDpqcEBzbWV0cy5jb20KeC1tb3ppbGxhLWNw
dDo7MApmbjpKZWFuLVBhdWwgU21ldHMKZW5kOnZjYXJkCg==
--------------877E53571CF6BC02E04F0949--





