[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Gregory Aharonian srctran@world.std.com
- Subject: [Patents] Re: [Patents] re :Answer to requests sent to french Economic
- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 15:45:23 -0400
These discussions about defining "software" are fairly pointless,
especially when the politicans are doing the talking.
For example, consider a digital circuit of AND and OR and NOT
gates. Pure hardware, you say, as does everyone else.
However, with circuit design tools, I can express the digital
circuit structure with VHDL and then use computer tools to
mainpulate the digital circuit (verification, floor planning).
However, I can also translate the VDHDL into Ada or C or something,
and "run" the circuit as an algorith,m.
So in light of patent equivalence laws, I argue that in light of
hardware/software codesign tools, the terms "hardware" and
"software?" are interchangeable, and should be reflected so in
patent laws.
Greg Aharonian
- [Patents] Re: [Patents] re :Answer to requests sent to french Economic, Gregory Aharonian srctran
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)