From marmalade@x-stream.co.uk Wed, 15 Dec 1999 22:32:41 -0000
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 22:32:41 -0000
From: Nick Fleming marmalade@x-stream.co.uk
Subject: [Patents] Re: [Patents] Re: source vs binary.

Jean-Jacques de Jong wrote :

> As regards interpreted languages, IMHO a software patent would only
> apply to the binary code temporarily produced by the interpreter. So
> only a user would fall under the patent, not the distributor of the
> program. 
>


Ah, I see. That would make sense. What that really means then
is that actual USAGE of the patented material constitutes an
infringement - regardless of whether the software was compiled
or interpreted. I like this idea, as it allows distribution of ANY
software, in ANY form without penalty (copyrights allowing
of course), and places the burden of responsibility with the
actual users.

Thanks for the insight - its made a few things much clearer!

Regards,

NickF.







