[Patents] Re: [Patents] Re: [Patents] Re: [Patents] Re: [Patents] Re: [Patents] Re: [Patents] Re: Patents digest, Vol 1 #162 - 2 msgs

[Prashant Uchil prashantu@hotmail.com]

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I INTEND TO CHALLENGE IN INTERNATIONAL COURTS BY MOVING 
THEM TO ADMIT PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATIONS OR A SIMILAR INSTRUMENT TO CAUSE 
AN EFFECT
REGARDS
PRASHANT UCHIL

>From: JS Kelly <jskelly@jskelly.com>
>Reply-To: JS Kelly <jskelly@jskelly.com>
>To: Bernard Lang <Bernard.Lang@inria.fr>
>CC: Prashant Uchil <prashantu@hotmail.com>, tom.vogt@ricardo.de, 
>patents@liberte.aful.org
>Subject: [Patents] Re: [Patents] Re: [Patents] Re: [Patents] Re: [Patents] 
>Re: [Patents] Re: Patents digest, Vol 1 #162 - 2 msgs
>Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 02:09:07 -0800 (PST)
>
>
>
> > If brain products can be chained, then brains should be too,
> > i.e. people.
> >   Of course I am not in favor of the latter.
> >   But a country has to have logic.
>
>But they are! Brains, I mean. A main reason I left my last job -- after
>only a few weeks -- was that the contract wording stated that any idea I
>had -- whether it related to my work or not, whether it came about on
>company time or vacation time, in short, any idea at all -- belonged to
>that company. I'm told this is common.
>
>-JS Kelly
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Patents maillist  -  Patents@liberte.aful.org
>http://liberte.aful.org/mailman/listinfo/patents

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com