[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'Jean-Jacques de Jong jean-jacques_de-jong@hp.com' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

clock@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz wrote:
> 
> > Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > If I published on a web reverse-engineered information about how to
> > > low-level program GeForce video card, would I infringe a patent or
> > > commit a crime?
> > >
> >
> > Publishing information cannot infringe a patent.
> 
> So the only thing I could infringe is a copyright. But if I did a
> reverse-engineering, I assume I would be the author of the description,
> not Nvidia. So is also copyright 100% OK?

That's OK too, because technical means (except for program code) are not
copyrighted. The text you intend to publish will be your copyright.

JJJ







(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)