[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: teb@gmx.li teb@gmx.li
- Subject: [Patents] Reverse negineered info
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 19:25:29 +0200 (MEST)
Zitiere Jean-Jacques de Jong <jean-jacques_de-jong@hp.com>:
> clock@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz wrote:
> >
> > > Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello
> > > >
> > > > If I published on a web reverse-engineered information about how to
> > > > low-level program GeForce video card, would I infringe a patent or
> > > > commit a crime?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Publishing information cannot infringe a patent.
> >
> > So the only thing I could infringe is a copyright. But if I did a
> > reverse-engineering, I assume I would be the author of the description,
> > not Nvidia. So is also copyright 100% OK?
>
> That's OK too, because technical means (except for program code) are not
> copyrighted. The text you intend to publish will be your copyright.
>
> JJJ
I cannot completely agree with you Jean-Jacques.
It is right, that one can get a copyright on own one's analysis. However
under
the law of European Community (put in force in the member states in the first
half of the last decade) the fact of reverse engineering a program can
infringe
the copyright. Generally reverse engineering is forbidden. An exception
applies, if it is done to allow interoperability.
A restricted act according to Art. 4 lit. b) is "translation, adaptation,
arrangement and any other alteration of a computer program". That includes
reverse engineering. An authorization by the rightholder of the program is
not
necessary under the conditions of Art. 6 of the directive. I do not see that
in
a case like that the aim is to establish interoperability and fulfill the
other
two conditions of Art. 6 lit a), c) of the directive.
If you are publishing you have to respect Art. 6 § 2 lit. b) of the
directive,
too.
However having the right to use that program you can study and test its
functioning while running it (Art. 5 § 3).
Thomas Ebinger
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE of 14 May 1991 on the legal protection of computer programs
(91/250/EEC)
(extracts)
Article 4
Restricted Acts Subject to the provisions of Articles 5 and 6,
the
exclusive rights of the rightholder within the
meaning of Article 2, shall include the right to do or to
authorize:
(a) the permanent or temporary reproduction of a computer program
by
any means and in any form, in part or in
whole. Insofar as loading, displaying, running, transmision or
storage of the computer program necessitate such
reproduction, such acts shall be subject to authorization by the
rightholder;
(b) the translation, adaptation, arrangement and any other
alteration of a computer program and the
reproduction of the results thereof, without prejudice to the
rights
of the person who alters the program;
(c) any form of distribution to the public, including the rental,
of
the original computer program or of copies
thereof. The first sale in the Community of a copy of a program
by
the rightholder or with his consent shall
exhaust the distribution right within the Community of that copy,
with the exception of the right to control further
rental of the program or a copy thereof.
Article 5
Exceptions to the restricted acts 1. In the absence of specific
contractual provisions, the acts referred to in
Article 4 (a) and (b) shall not require authorization by the
rightholder where they are necessary for the use of the
computer program by the lawful acquirer in accordance with its
intended purpose, including for error correction.
2. The making of a back-up copy by a person having a right to use
the computer program may not be prevented
by contract insofar as it is necessary for that use.
3. The person having a right to use a copy of a computer program
shall be entitled, without the authorization of
the rightholder, to observe, study or test the functioning of the
program in order to determine the ideas and
principles which underlie any element of the program if he does
so
while performing any of the acts of loading,
displaying, running, transmitting or storing the program which he
is
entitled to do.
Article 6
Decompilation 1. The authorization of the rightholder shall not
be
required where reproduction of the code and
translation of its form within the meaning of Article 4 (a) and
(b)
are indispensable to obtain the information
necessary to achieve the interoperability of an independently
created computer program with other programs,
provided that the following conditions are met:
(a) these acts are performed by the licensee or by another person
having a right to use a copy of a program, or
on their behalf by a person authorized to to so;
(b) the information necessary to achieve interoperability has not
previously been readily available to the persons
referred to in subparagraph (a); and
(c) these acts are confined to the parts of the original program
which are necessary to achieve interoperability.
2. The provisions of paragraph 1 shall not permit the information
obtained through its application:
(a) to be used for goals other than to achieve the
interoperability
of the independently created computer
program;
(b) to be given to others, except when necessary for the
interoperability of the independently created computer
program; or
(c) to be used for the development, production or marketing of a
computer program substantially similar in its
expression, or for any other act which infringes copyright.
3. In accordance with the provisions of the Berne Convention for
the
protection of Literary and Artistic Works,
the provisions of this Article may not be interpreted in such a
way
as to allow its application to be used in a
manner which unreasonably prejudices the right holder's
legitimate
interests or conflicts with a normal
exploitation of the computer program.
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)