[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Didier Metzen didier.metzen1@libertysurf.fr
- Subject: [Patents] Some good and sane solutions to several insane problems
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 21:30:21 +0200
Yes perhaps for drivers writing and backdoor finging or I would say quality
control
Learning: well I am not convinced. There are so many books with so many source
code available and also GPL source code.
Decompiling for learning in the past was probably important but I doubt it is
now.
Sincerely
Didier
Gert Wollny a écrit:
>
> > B - Copyright & others
> > ================
> >
> > "
> > I don't like copyright law on some issues, too. For example:
> > prohibition of decompilation. That really stupid rule is making
> > lives of engineers more difficult. If you buy a radio, you always
> > may open it and look inside. If you 'buy' program - you may not.
> > Illogical and appalling.
> > "
> >
> > I don't understand this point. Why do you need to decompile everything?
> > What's your goal here?
> Just some ideas: To create compatibility (say - write a driver for
> another OS or some software which uses the same dataformat for
> exchange), for security (backdoors & co are more visible if you see a
> decompiled version or even the source) and to learn and make better
> solutions.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Gert
>
> --
> --------------------- may the source be with you ---------------------
> http://gerti.home.pages.de
>
> _______________________________________________
> Patents maillist - Patents@liberte.aful.org
> http://liberte.aful.org/mailman/listinfo/patents
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)