[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Edward Avis epa98@doc.ic.ac.uk
- Subject: [Patents] Re: FT Germany article
- Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 12:33:23 +0100 (BST)
>From: Stefane Fermigier <sf@fermigier.com>
>Subject: [Patents] German speaker wanted.
>I've just found this article the Financial Times Deutschland:
>
>http://www.ftd.de/tm/te/FTD962824480673.html?nv=3Dhptn
>
>``EU-Kommission entscheidet sich gegen Software-Patente''
I'm not a native German speaker but as far as I can tell this is just
the standard Commission line, that patentability is not being extended.
>Aus Kommissionskreisen erfuhr die Financial Times Deutschland, dass
>man nur Bedarf f=FCr eine rechtliche Klarstellung sieht, nicht aber f=FCr
>eine =C4nderung des bisherigen Verfahrens.
(hope those characters come out all right)
'The FT Germany learnt from the Commission that clarification of the
existing rules was needed, but not a change in the previous policy.'
It goes on to say that software patents can only be granted if the
software forms 'part of a technical system', and that the EPO has
already granted about 20 000 software patents under this rule. Of
course any software patent can be phrased in such a manner.
--=20
Ed Avis
epa98@doc.ic.ac.uk
- [Patents] Re: FT Germany article, Edward Avis epa98
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)