[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: John Tobey jtobey@john-edwin-tobey.org
- Subject: [Freesw] Re: [Patents] gouvernement 'buy up' patents or copyright
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 15:58:02 -0400 (EDT)
Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk> wrote:
> Kristoff Bonne wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Jean-Paul Smets wrote:
> > >> Just a thought:
> > >> In the 'old economy', society (usually the national states) has the
> > >> right
> > >> to 'buy up' property (land) of individuals if it serves 'the greater
> > >> good'
> > >> (e.g. to build a railway track).
> > >> This is a generally excepted principle.
> > >> So, why not extend this principle to the 'knowledge economy' and give
> > >> the
> > >> gouvernement (at national and/or European level) the right to 'buy out'
> > > ...
> > > This is not a new idea. It is a good idea. The problem is how to name
> > > it.
> > > - collectivisation of public interest patents ?
> > > - nationalisation of public interest patents ?
> > > As you see, this two terms are not so good in order to convince. I am
> > > looking
> > > for better ones.
> > What's the correct english sentence why the state buys up a piece of land
> > where it was to build a railway-track, harbor, ....
>
> Compulsory purchase.
Eminent domain.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?jump=eminent+domain :
a right of a government to take private property for
public use by virtue of the superior dominion of the
sovereign power over all lands within its jurisdiction
--
John Tobey, late nite hacker <jtobey@john-edwin-tobey.org>
\\\ ///
]]] With enough bugs, all eyes are shallow. [[[
/// \\\
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)