From didier.metzen1@libertysurf.fr  Wed Sep  6 23:33:49 2000
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 01:33:49 +0200
From: Didier Metzen didier.metzen1@libertysurf.fr
Subject: [Patents] Re: ICANN elections -- Endorsement of a candidate -- URGENT

Several remarks in the text below:

PILCH Hartmut a crit:

> Bernhard Lang writes about Benhamou
>
> >    I believe he is a brilliant candidate for Europe, and I recommand
> > endorsing his participation in the final vote.
>
> but recently on this list I read a chilling statement from Benhamou:
>
>    Un manifestant alpague Bernard
>    Benhamou, l'un des candidats franais les mieux placs pour les
>    lections au directoire de l'Icann, l'organisme mondial qui supervise
>    le fonctionnement d'Internet. L'change est assez vif. Avec la
>    temprance compasse du prof de Sciences-Po, Benhamou explique : "Il
>    faut aller vers une diminution de la dure de vie de la proprit
>    intellectuelle, tout en maintenant le principe des brevets, car il
>    est lgitime de rmunrer les ides." Joris Vanderhoeven, chercheur au
>    CNRS, rpond : "En informatique, l'innovation est rapide et
>    spontane.
>    Les brevets sur les logiciels ne rcompensent pas l'innovation. Ils
>    ne
>    font que servir les stratgies de dveloppement des grandes
>    socits." 
>
> If this is reported correctly, Benhamou has not the faintest idea about
> the problem of software patents and just carelessly enounces the kind of
> prejudice that the most immature layman might have on the subject.
>
> According people ownership on abstract ideas is something outrageous even
> to patent experts, who go long ways to pretend that they are patenting
> only a "technical invention".

What do you think of copyright? It is also ownership on any kind of ideas.


> At the same time, "reducing the
> duration" is a dead-end strategy that violates TRIPS and is not even
> justifyable, because for many material inventions (such as should be
> patentable under classical patent law) 20 years is not too much but too
> little.
>

If you have this strong position on patents in general (material invention), I
don't understand at all your position on any kind of patents on software. I
don't understand why you promote a such huge difference between both types.
Ecomical logic is the same.


>
> What chills me even more is that Bernhard Lang introduces M. Benhamou as a
> person with special competence on the issue of intellectual property.
> Thils leads me to conclude that he must be a mischievous propagandist of
> the patent lobby, since I can no longer excuse his statements by
> ignorance.
>

Everybody is a foe, isn't it?


>
> -phm
>
> _______________________________________________
> Patents maillist  -  Patents@liberte.aful.org
> http://liberte.aful.org/mailman/listinfo/patents







