[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Steve Probert steve.probert@patent.gov.uk
- Subject: [Patents] simple questions
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 10:48:03 +0100
>Continuing speaking from a linguistic approach, I used "will" then,
>Why you speak about the "last thirty years".
I assume, because patents have been granted for software throughout that
period; though judging by many of the contributions to this list I can
understand why some might think otherwise.
If the EPC is amended next month, the most significant result may be that
people realise that software can (in some circumstances) be patented. Now
(speculating), I wonder whether that might be one reason for the proposed
amendment?
Steve Probert
- [Patents] simple questions, Roberto Micarelli mi . ro
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Patents] simple questions,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] simple questions,
Nicolas MONNET nico
- [Patents] simple questions,
Gregory Aharonian srctran
- [Patents] simple questions,
dewaz dewaz
- [Patents] simple questions,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] simple questions, Steve Probert steve . probert
- [Patents] simple questions,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] simple questions,
Steve Probert steve . probert
- [Patents] simple questions,
Steve Probert steve . probert
- [Patents] simple questions,
Gregory Aharonian srctran
- [Patents] simple questions,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] simple questions,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] simple questions,
dewaz dewaz
- [Patents] simple questions,
Gregory Aharonian srctran
- [Patents] simple questions,
dewaz dewaz
- [Patents] simple questions,
PILCH Hartmut phm
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)