[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Steve Probert steve.probert@patent.gov.uk
- Subject: [Patents] simple questions
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:01:02 +0100
>Hi!
>I wish you have some minutes and tell us in what "circumstances" is soft
>patentable or not.
According to the Courts in the UK (and the Boards of Appeal of the EPO),
computer programs that are capable of producing a technical effect when run
on a computer are patentable. They are not regarded as computer programs as
such. They are more than just a computer program. They are technical
inventions that just happen to be implemented using a computer program. In
almost every such case, alternative means might have been used to implement
the invention, and the Courts have taken the view that it is the invention
that must be considered, not the means by which the applicant has suggested
that it might be implemented.
>Sorry, I would like to ask you here about something you wrote in other
>e-mail. -What is your opinion about patenting methods of doing business?
I have no opinion about whether or not methods of doing business should be
patentable. There are very good reasons on both sides. All I want to ensure
is that if the system is changed, it is changed following full
consultation/debate, and in the knowledge of the consequences.
>-Do you mean patenting something like "leasing","factoring" or
>"franchised shops"?
>-Why not patenting contracts or stipulations "as such"?
>-An old business method would be newer enough for you (and thus
>patentable) just because is made thanks of Internet?
A method of doing business is a bit like an elephant - Not very easy to
describe in writing, but we all know one when we see one. For example,
methods of raising taxes, buying and selling shares, running an auction,
managing a pension fund, hotel management etc. are all typically methods of
doing business. In the UK, a method of doing business is a method of doing
business however it is done. Using the Internet (or any other technical
equipment) will not make it patentable. So whether it is an old business
method or a new one makes no difference - it is an excluded item.
Hope this helps.
Steve Probert
!
- [Patents] simple questions, Roberto Micarelli mi . ro
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Patents] simple questions,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] simple questions,
Nicolas MONNET nico
- [Patents] simple questions,
Gregory Aharonian srctran
- [Patents] simple questions,
dewaz dewaz
- [Patents] simple questions,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] simple questions,
Steve Probert steve . probert
- [Patents] simple questions,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] simple questions,
Steve Probert steve . probert
- [Patents] simple questions, Steve Probert steve . probert
- [Patents] simple questions,
Gregory Aharonian srctran
- [Patents] simple questions,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] simple questions,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] simple questions,
dewaz dewaz
- [Patents] simple questions,
Gregory Aharonian srctran
- [Patents] simple questions,
dewaz dewaz
- [Patents] simple questions,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] simple questions,
Gregory Aharonian srctran
- [Patents] simple questions,
dewaz dewaz
- [Patents] simple questions,
PILCH Hartmut phm
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)