[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: dewaz dewaz@ran.es
- Subject: [Patents] simple questions
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 19:20:38 -0700
PILCH Hartmut wrote:
>
> > Look at the number of software products on the market, the number of
> > pages of publications for IT, the number of jobs, etc. All have been
> > steadily rising for years, and will only drop for non-patent reasons
> > (like the NASDAQ crashing or the Internet mania losing its potency).
>
> For many years, there were only a few software patents around.
> The number of patents is now increasing much faster than the number of IT
> jobs.
> But the IT market is still expanding.
> This will however not go on without limits.
> When people start getting worried about limited ressources, they will look
> at how they can use their by then big patent portfolios to fight off
> competitors.
If they do so ,they will lost even the pocket money.
> And even while the IT market continues expanding, it will be forced into a
> capitalist pattern with investors and patent lawyers determining the
> direction.
> The days where a small group of people would write a nifty program and
> earn money through copyright will be gone, just as the days where people
> sooner or later published source code and contributed to a public sphere
> of open source software.
>
That has no stop.
Do not give up!!
;^)
> Just as Mr Dignatz said in Bruxelles: if you destroy an ecosystem, it
> won't come back again for decades. And in Europe, this is the ecosystem
> that is currently flourishing. Huge enterprises centered around capital
> and lawyers are an American phenomenon, and for long years to come, such
> concentration will not take place in Europe but in Silicon Valley.
Well IMHO usually lawyers are no more greedier than customers who pay
them.
I understand capitalism as a balance of more or less auto controlled
forces.
Soft patent break the balance and make the free market really difficult.
I think than the worse we ,anti soft patent, could do is performing a
sort of Europe versus USA.
IS NOT THAT!
It is an universal problem ,in Hamburg or in Cleveland.
--
Futuro Agonico S.A es propietaria de la patente 4129583 que protege el
proceso de respuesta de correos electronicos.
Evite acciones judiciales subscribiendo nuestro preceptivo canon.
http://www.ran.es/personal/dewaz/paynow.htm
- [Patents] simple questions, (continued)
- [Patents] simple questions,
Gregory Aharonian srctran
- [Patents] simple questions,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] simple questions,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] simple questions,
dewaz dewaz
- [Patents] simple questions,
Gregory Aharonian srctran
- [Patents] simple questions,
dewaz dewaz
- [Patents] simple questions,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] simple questions,
Gregory Aharonian srctran
- [Patents] simple questions,
dewaz dewaz
- [Patents] simple questions,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] simple questions, dewaz dewaz
- [Patents] simple questions,
Bernard Lang Bernard . Lang
- [Patents] simple questions,
Steve Probert steve . probert
- [Patents] simple questions,
Steve Probert steve . probert
- [Patents] simple questions,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] simple questions,
Steve Probert steve . probert
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)