[Patents] Re: Technical effect

[dewaz dewaz@ran.es]

Gregory Aharonian wrote:


> So while I won't argue that software patents promote progress because
> I don't have the data to argue so, I also don't have the data to
> argue that software patents are hurting progress, and that there would
> be more progress if there were no software patents.
I still remember when you wrote that soft patents were good even for
small companies.  


> 
> Look, what Europe decides to do with its software patenting laws is
> up to Europeans.  I suspect they will get rid of 52c to bring EPO
> practices into conformance with the "laws" and to be more harmonious
> with the US. 
when is US going to have a law for excluding soft patents clearly,
and be more harmonious with Europe?

> I can also sympathize with arguments to keep and
> toughen 52c (not that I agree).  All I am saying is that you guys
> on this list are not doing a very good job of convincing me, and
> that you need to find better arguments.

If you don't anwser questions and change arguments...
Do you remenber what you said about the two sort of soft ,embedded and
pure?
What you said about novelty yesterday?
be consistent!

-- 
Futuro Agonico S.A es propietaria de la patente 4129583 que protege el 
proceso de respuesta de correos electronicos.
Evite acciones judiciales subscribiendo nuestro preceptivo canon.
http://www.ran.es/personal/dewaz/paynow.htm