[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Stefane Fermigier sf@fermigier.com
- Subject: [Patents] ZD article on Raph Levien's patents
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 22:50:45 +0100
http://www.zdnet.com/intweek/stories/news/0,4164,2650749,00.html
Meanwhile, Eric Raymond, another open source advocate, has been trying
to push what he calls the "Chinese finger trap proposal." Patent
licensees could be locked into protecting open source projects.
Raymond proposes that some major company with both a strong portfolio
of patents and an abiding interest in open source software prohibit
its licensees from suing open source developers. That is, if a company
like IBM adopted such a policy and third parties wanted to license its
patents, they must forgo enforcing their own patents when open source
projects use the ideas.
[...]
But there's no simple answer to the problem of using patents in open
source software. Levien recognizes the paradox: On one hand, he made
money from forcing everyone who used his patented ideas to give him
royalties. On the other, he shared the source code of several programs
and recognized how the cooperation helped him and others. The two
models were in conflict. Levien asked himself, "How can I reconcile my
patents with my open source development?" The result was the
royalty-free license for those who also share their source code.
For now, it seems that kind of generosity is the best the open source
community can hope for.
Of course, in Europe software patents are still illegal, so what we can
hope for is that they stay that way so this is a completly different
situation.
S.
--
Stéfane Fermigier, Tel: 06 63 04 12 77 (mobile).
<www.portalux.com>: le portail Linux / logiciel libre.
"Amazon: we patent the dot in .com"
- [Patents] ZD article on Raph Levien's patents, Stefane Fermigier sf
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)