[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Nick F. marmalade@libertysurf.co.uk
Subject: [Patents] viagra overturned
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 14:32:14 -0000

I read this interesting article.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/business/newsid_1013000/1013244.stm

I think its interesting because of the reasons the judge gave for
invalidating the patent - that it was based on already published
PUBLIC DOMAIN work.

I wonder if a similar ruling can apply to software ??

Regards,

Nick. F.

[Patents] viagra overturned, Nick F . marmalade
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Patents] viagra overturned, John Smith notobvious
- [Patents] viagra overturned, Bernard Lang Bernard . Lang
- [Patents] viagra overturned, PILCH Hartmut phm

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)