[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'Steve Probert steve.probert@patent.gov.uk' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
>I do not quite agree with Steve Probert - I thought the rule was as
>follows:

Bernard is most likely quite correct.  The mechanics of the system are, as 
you have seen, very complex.  But the point I was seeking to make was that it 
will require more than just a simple majority to defeat the amendment.  I 
wasn't sure which was the two thirds (14) and which was the three quarters 
(15).  As the difference was only one vote, it seemed easier and simpler to 
err on the side of safety.  My apologies for any (undue) confusion.

Steve Probert
                                                                              
                                                                              
                                                                              
                                                                              
                                                                              
                                                                              
                                                                              
                                                                              
                                                                              
                               





(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)