[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: PILCH Hartmut phm@a2e.de
- Subject: [Patents] FFII Database of European Software Patents and Press Conference
- Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 11:06:27 +0100 (CET)
_________________________________________________________________
=20
=20
European Software Patents: "More Trivial than in the US"
=20
Programmers publish "European Software Patent Horror Gallery"
=20
European patent officials want to activate 30000 mines next week
=20
=20
For immediate Release
=20
Munich - The European Patent Office (EPO) has in recent years granted
30000 patents on programming problems, business ideas and
organisational procedures. If national courts consistently followed
the will of the EPO, it would no longer be legal to conduct automated
medical diagnoses in Europe. The same applies to numerous mundane
activities such as conducting of examinations in schools, bringing
traders together at the stock exchange, generating purchasing lists
from cooking recipes, setting prices dynamically, learning languages
by comparing one's pronounciation with that of a teacher. All these
activities infringe on European patents, as soon as they are organised
in an obvious way using computers. Other EPO patents encumber network
standards such as MIME and CGI and squatter the operating system level
by occupying thousands of basic methods of memory arithmetics, making
programming a hazardous endeavour.
=20
The Association for the Promotion of a Free Informational
Infrastructure (FFII) has published a database of software patents
granted by the EPO, together with some impressive examples, statistics
and articles.
=20
The FFII's patent data referent, Arnim Rupp, recommends that anybody
discussing about software patents should first have a look at that
database:
=20
By browsing through the EPO's patents you will quickly find out
that this has nothing to do with protecting software, let alone
protecting innovative solutions. What this is really about is
occupying complete problems. Fortunately for us, these hilariously
trivial and gruesomely broad EPO patent claims are so far not
necessarily enforcable before European courts. The American mega
corporations, to whom most of these illegally granted patents
belong, are still waiting for a change in the European Patent
Convention. If the Diplomatic Conference sets the wrong signal in
Munich next week, Germany will hopefully abide by the words of the
Ministery of Justice and refuse to ratify the new European Patent
Convention. The situation is serious enough to justify this. The
European patent system will work one way or another. The issue at
stake now is how to keep 30000 mines from detonating and how to
give back basic legal security to European IT enterprises and
citizens.
=20
For Daniel R=F6dding, CEO of a software enterprise in Paderborn, the
situation is very serious:
=20
By browsing the FFII's patent data base you can quickly grasp what
software patents mean for most European IT companies today. On such
a minefield small software companies hardly have any chance
anymore. For my company I have already drawn the consequences:
Starting from mid of next year we will conduct large parts of our
software development in a country which does not yet have such a
highly developped patent law system and in which a change of the
legal situation cannot be expected for the near future. In certain
fields the development of software is becoming too dangerous in
Germany. Given the longterm legal risks, continuing with this
activity in Germany would be irresponsible from a small
entrepreneur's point of view.
=20
So far already 200 software companies and 55000 signataries of the
Eurolinux Petition have expressed themselves in a similar way.
=20
Meanwhile at the "Diplomatic Conference" patent representatives of 20
European countries will be negotiating about a "Base Proposal for the
Revision of the European Patent Convention" drafted by EPO president
Dr. Ingo Kober. Therein the EPO proposes among others to stipulate
universal patentability (Art 52) and to confer special legislative
rights on the administrative council of the EPO (Art 33). The rules or
procedure have been determined by the EPO in such a way that national
patent delegations can overrule individual items only by a 2/3
majority. Otherwise the will of the EPO will become legally binding in
all European countries whose parliaments do not opt out of the
European Patent Convention (EPC).
=20
The FFII will together with sponsoring software companies and system
architects like Richard Stallman present its "European Software Patent
Horror Gallery" on November 21 11-12:30 near the EPO in Forum der
Technik, Helios conference room, and respond to journalists'
questions. Richard Stallman has founded GNU project and the League for
Programming Freedom, which argued the case against software
patentability in the United States since 1990.
=20
References
* European Software Patents: Database and Examples -
http://swpat.ffii.org/vreji/pikta/indexen.html
* Eurolinux Petition for a software patent Free Europe -
http://petition.eurolinux.org/index.en.html
* Dr. Swen Kiesewetter-K=F6binger: =DCber die Patentpr=FCfung von
Programmen f=FCr Datenverarbeitungsanlagen -- Probleme und
Ungereimtheiten der Softwarepatentierung aus der Sicht eines
Pr=FCfers am Deutschen Patent- und Markenamt -
http://swpat.ffii.org/vreji/prina/patpruef.pdf
* comparative report about the examination practise for software
patents at the US, European and Japanese patent offices -
http://www.jpo-miti.go.jp/saikine/repo242.htm
* German Ministery of Justice demands that the computer program
exception not be removed at the coming conference and threatens to
opt out of the EPC otherwise -
http://www.spiegel.de/druckversion/0,1588,100120,00.html
* Protecting Informational Innovation against the Abuse of the
Patent System - http://swpat.ffii.org
* A simplistic but true introduction to the problem (German only) -
http://www.save-our-software.de
* GNU Project - http://www.gnu.org
* Software Patents - Leage for Programming Freedom -
http://lpf.ai.mit.edu/Patents/
=20
About FFII - www.ffii.org
FFII is a non-profit association which promotes the development of
open interfaces, open source software and freely available public
information. FFII coordinates a workgroup on software patents which is
sponsored by successful german software publishers. FFII is member of
the EuroLinux Alliance.
=20
Press Contacts
email:
info@ffii.org
=20
Tel:
Hartmut Pilch +49-89-18979927
=20
Permanent URL for this PR
http://swpat.ffii.org/news/pikta
_________________________________________________________________
=20
=20
http://swpat.ffii.org/news/pikta/indexen.html
2000-11-19 SWPAT-AG des FFII
- [Patents] FFII Database of European Software Patents and Press Conference, PILCH Hartmut phm
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Patents] FFII Database of European Software Patents and Press Conference, PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] FFII Database of European Software Patents and Press Conference,
Gregory Aharonian srctran
- [Patents] FFII Database of European Software Patents and Press Conference,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] FFII Database of European Software Patents and Press Conference,
Gregory Aharonian srctran
- [Patents] FFII Database of European Software Patents and Press Conference,
Jean-Marc Libs libs
- [Patents] FFII Database of European Software Patents and Press Conference,
Bernard Lang Bernard . Lang
- [Patents] FFII Database of European Software Patents and Press Conference,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] FFII Database of European Software Patents and Press Conference,
Gregory Aharonian srctran
- [Patents] FFII Database of European Software Patents and Press Conference,
Gregory Aharonian srctran
- [Patents] FFII Database of European Software Patents and Press Conference,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] FFII Database of European Software Patents and Press Conference,
PILCH Hartmut phm
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)