[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: PILCH Hartmut phm@a2e.de
- Subject: [Patents] ABstracts to articles on hardware/software codesign
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 18:06:28 +0100 (CET)
> It's a great thing that you have showed that hardware is a medium of
> software. But all that shows also that a software programm can always
> improve the hardware functionality so to have a technical effect.
Of course software has a "technical effect" in the meaningless sense in
which this word is used by the EPO. But even in the traditional clear
sense, it has a technical effect, i.e. a physical effect. It moves
electrons around in a computer. Even when people play on a musical
instrument, there is a technical / physical effect. But that effect is
generally not a part of any claimed invention. Software innovations do
not qualify as new ways of using natural forces to directly cause a
hitherto unexpected physical effect.
We badly need a FAQ on the basic concepts of the patent systems which we
can point patent experts to. A lot of these experts just pretend not to
understand the ABC of the patent system when such non-understanding suits
their cause.
-phm
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)