[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Robert Bielik Robert.Bielik@gyrosmicro.com
- Subject: [Patents] Hardware/software codesign
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 08:33:59 +0100
"Classical" industry has evolved pretty well, wouldn't you say ? We now =
have
cars that run pretty well, computers that are fairly speedy. If this is =
in
spite of "classical" patents is of course impossible to state. However =
there
is one item regarding patents that I personally think do not apply to
software:
- 20 years of protection. Just think of it. 20 years of protection for =
a sw
patent when in sw, within 1 year, everything is "obvious". Absurd. =
Totally
absurd.
And the model from the USA (which patent lawyers wish to apply in =
Europe)
shows already that sw patents are NOT beneficial to society. If small =
to
medium sized companies go under due to being sued for infringement, =
even
when not justified, I think that is HIGHLY non-beneficial to society as =
a
whole.
Robert Bielik
SSE
Gyros Microlabs
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Didier Metzen [mailto:didier.metzen1@libertysurf.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 1:44=20
> To: Robert Bielik
> Cc: 'patents@liberte.aful.org'
> Subject: Re: [Patents] Hardware/software codesign
>=20
>=20
> OK where is the answer "are classical patents beneficial to=20
> society today"?
>=20
> By the way, two companies are now trying to get fees from=20
> their patent on MPEG
> algorithm. One is german, the second is french.
> Does somebody know where these patents have been granted?
>=20
> Didier
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Robert Bielik a =E9crit:
>=20
> > Ed Avis wrote:
> >
> > >It's an impressive list of tools for designing hardware,=20
> but it doesn't
> > >say anything about whether patents on computer programs=20
> are of benefit
> > >to society.
> >
> > Which also is the ONLY valid consideration whether patents=20
> on SW should be
> > or
> > not be. The argument that because patents on mechanical=20
> devices are granted,
> > sw
> > patents should likewise be granted is the classical=20
> "sandbox" argument: "If
> > you have it,
> > I must have it also". Mr Aharonian as well as other=20
> proponents fail to
> > answer the
> > one and ONLY question: IS SW PATENTS BENEFICIAL TO SOCIETY ???
> >
> > Robert Bielik
> > Senior Software Engineer
> > Gyros Microlabs
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Patents maillist - Patents@liberte.aful.org
> > http://liberte.aful.org/mailman/listinfo/patents
>=20
>=20
- [Patents] Hardware/software codesign, Edward Avis epa98
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Patents] Hardware/software codesign,
Robert Bielik Robert . Bielik
- [Patents] Hardware/software codesign,
Gregory Aharonian srctran
- [Patents] Hardware/software codesign,
Bernard Lang Bernard . Lang
- [Patents] Hardware/software codesign,
Gregory Aharonian srctran
- [Patents] Hardware/software codesign,
Bernard Lang Bernard . Lang
- [Patents] Hardware/software codesign,
John Tobey jtobey
- [Patents] Hardware/software codesign,
Didier Metzen didier . metzen1
- [Patents] Hardware/software codesign, Robert Bielik Robert . Bielik
- [Patents] Hardware/software codesign,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] Hardware/software codesign,
Luuk van Dijk Luuk . van . Dijk
- [Patents] Hardware/software codesign,
Daniel Probst daniel . probst
- [Patents] Hardware/software codesign,
Didier Metzen didier . metzen1
- [Patents] Hardware/software codesign,
Robert Bielik Robert . Bielik
- [Patents] Hardware/software codesign,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] Hardware/software codesign,
PILCH Hartmut phm
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)