[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Erik Josefsson poiqwe@excite.com
- Subject: [Patents] swpat source
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 17:39:46 -0800 (PST)
Steve Probert wrote:
>Source code is always published with
>a patent specification - when the
>applicant files source code that is.
Could you compile and run any of the swpat code
that is published in UK? If not, why not?
If the monopoly/publicity principle should be upheld,
wouldn't it be reasonable to file working examples of
what the invention does?
Why is not source code to a swpat compulsory?
(In the case of the "perpetual motion machine", I heard that it's a standard
patent office joke allways to ask for a working model before filing the
patent.)
>In many cases the program listing forms an appendix which is open to
>public inspection (at the Patent Office) but not printed, primarily
>because of the cost and bulk.
So you can provide the monopoly, but not the publicity because of the cost
and bulk?
//Erik
(I'm not arguing - I have a language problem ;-)
_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
- [Patents] swpat source, Erik Josefsson poiqwe
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)