[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Steve Probert steve.probert@patent.gov.uk
- Subject: [Patents] monopoly/publicity contradiction?
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:38:58 +0000
PILCH Hartmut wrote:
> ...This is also why this talk about "not the programs as such but only
> the technical solution" is nonsense, unless "technical solution" refers to
> something different than a programming solution, both at a conceptual and
> at a practical level, as explained in the Eurolinux regulation proposal.
I think we will have to agree to differ.
--
Steve Probert
Deputy Director
The Patent Office
- [Patents] monopoly/publicity contradiction?, Erik Josefsson poiqwe
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Patents] monopoly/publicity contradiction?,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] monopoly/publicity contradiction?,
Steve Probert steve . probert
- [Patents] monopoly/publicity contradiction?, Steve Probert steve . probert
- [Patents] monopoly/publicity contradiction?,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] monopoly/publicity contradiction?,
Steve Probert steve . probert
- [Patents] monopoly/publicity contradiction?,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] monopoly/publicity contradiction?,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] monopoly/publicity contradiction?,
Steve Probert steve . probert
- [Patents] monopoly/publicity contradiction?,
Gert Wollny wollny
- [Patents] monopoly/publicity contradiction?,
Toast marmalade
- [Patents] monopoly/publicity contradiction?,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] monopoly/publicity contradiction?,
Nick F . marmalade
- [Patents] monopoly/publicity contradiction?,
Bernard Lang Bernard . Lang
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)