[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: A +W Endres endres-sifi@t-online.de
- Subject: [Patents] regulation draft proposal: revision
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 18:21:59 +0100
Dear Mr. Pellegrini,
> Another salient example is MP3 encoders, with for instance
BladeEnc
> vs. Thomson Multimedia the villain, and all of the Ogg
sequels...
Could you explain the problem that you have with the MP3 licensing
scheme. It is well
documented to the world under http://mp3licensing.com.
There you find some 65 companies that have acquired licenses already. Is
your point
that some companies should get preferred treatment, like e.g. the Open
Source
community?
Al Endres, Sindelfingen, Germany
- [Patents] regulation draft proposal: revision, (continued)
- [Patents] regulation draft proposal: revision,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] regulation draft proposal: revision,
Gregory Aharonian srctran
- [Patents] regulation draft proposal: revision,
Nick F . marmalade
- [Patents] regulation draft proposal: revision,
Bernard Lang Bernard . Lang
- [Patents] regulation draft proposal: revision,
Ram'on Garc'ia Fern'andez ramon
- [Patents] regulation draft proposal: revision,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] regulation draft proposal: revision,
Gregory Aharonian srctran
- [Patents] regulation draft proposal: revision,
PILCH Hartmut phm
- [Patents] regulation draft proposal: revision,
Gregory Aharonian srctran
- [Patents] regulation draft proposal: revision,
Francois PELLEGRINI pelegrin
- [Patents] regulation draft proposal: revision, A +W Endres endres-sifi
- [Patents] regulation draft proposal: revision,
Xavier Drudis Ferran xdrudis
- [Patents] regulation draft proposal: revision,
Francois PELLEGRINI pelegrin
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)