[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Gregory Aharonian srctran@world.std.com
- Subject: [Patents] Copyrights can be just as freedom threatening and abusive
- Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 21:54:17 -0500 (EST)
For all the complaints about the abuses of patents and hypothetical losses
of freedom, copyrights can be just as abused and freedom threatening.
Greg Aharonian
>http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,40850,00.html
>
> Free Links, Only $50 Apiece
> by Declan McCullagh (declan@wired.com)
> 2:00 a.m. Dec. 28, 2000 PST
>
> WASHINGTON -- Online news sites are turning to a novel way to make
> some extra cash: requiring fees for links.
>
> The Albuquerque Journal charges $50 for the right to link to each of
> its articles. Localbusiness.com and Latino.com are more generous, and
> permit one to five links without payment.
>
> There's just one catch. Legal experts say no U.S. law or court
> decision allows a website to successfully demand payment for links
> to its content. Such linking is a common practice online and allows
> services like search engines to exist.
>
> "They have no right to use the legal system to stop the linking," says
> Eugene Volokh, a professor of law at UCLA. "But if sites really want
> to stop linking, they can easily do it by technological means, by
> periodically shifting the file names of their pages, by delivering the
> pages using CGI scripts rather than direct links, or by including HTML
> code that checks the address of the site from which the user arrived."
>
> The sites that limit unapproved linking rely on a service provided by
> Renton, Washington, startup iCopyright.com. In exchange for a portion
> of the licensing revenues, customarily less than 50 percent,
> icopyright.com handles collecting payment for article reprints,
> photocopy licenses or links.
>
> Nobody questions a publisher's legal right to demand payments for
> article reprints, at least for substantial quantities. But
> iCopyright's license agreement, which is featured at the bottom of
> articles at its partners' sites, says the company can selectively
> grant or withhold "HTML Link permission (that) allows you to link
> to a specified Web page."
>
> The iCopyright.com license agreement also restricts what can be said
> about the content of the linked-to article. If you sign up to pay $50
> to link to, say, an Albuquerque Journal article, you agree not to say
> anything "derogatory" about "the author, the publication from which
> the content came, or any person connected with the creation of the
> content or depicted in the content."
>
> Because the agreement limits negative comments about someone
> "depicted" in a news story, someone linking to an article about
> President-elect George W. Bush and Vice President Al Gore would
> not be permitted to criticize either one.
>
> Paula Tobol, iCopyright.com's senior marketing manager, defended the
> company's license agreements. "The license is to guarantee the link
> and give you peace of mind that it will stay available for a specified
> period of time," Tobol said in e-mail to Wired News. "Currently, the
> legal issue of linking is somewhat unclear."
- [Patents] Copyrights can be just as freedom threatening and abusive, Gregory Aharonian srctran
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)