[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Gregory Aharonian srctran@world.std.com
- Subject: Odp: [Patents] Bessen & Maskin reply on software patent paper
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 20:00:48 -0500 (EST)
>Why is why Samuelson, Kapor and Davis did not get much momentum behind
>their initiative.
There were many problems with their initiative. For exameple, one part of
their proposal was for government agencies to determine some reasonable
amount of compensation for a commercial software product. Given the
government's general lack of experience and familiarity with commercializing
products, this was a funny part of their proposal, more the bizarre
because Kapor signed his name to something that totally conflicted with
his 1-2-3 experiences.
Second, they misrepresented the history of Xerox and Apple/Jobs, in
order to create a problem they could solve with their sui generis
proposal.
Their proposal went nowhere because it was and still is a bad solution.
Greg Aharonian
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)