[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'Martin Wahlén mva@df.lth.se' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
> The courts in the US struggled  for years and eventually realized the
> impossibility of practically discriminating against software.  What I
> see
> out of European governments is much the same.  And massive letter
> writing wrote sway anyone - even EPO saw through this charade.

Greg, where would you draw the line on patentability then? It must be
placed somewhere, and you seem to ask for extending it further and
further. Where should it be drawn?

Martin






(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)