From jean-paul.smets@mines.org  Sun Apr  1 06:45:31 2001
From: jean-paul.smets@mines.org (Jean-Paul Smets)
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 07:45:31 +0200
Subject: [Patents] French State secretary for Industry against SoftPat
In-Reply-To: <B6EBFF1B.127D%pb@breese.fr>
References: <B6EBFF1B.127D%pb@breese.fr>
Message-ID: <01040107453104.00657@jungle>

You probably did not read my email. Could you please read it again. You can 
take any example from the USPTO base or from software you use everyday.
Here is the original mail again.

Could you give us an few examples of software which satisfy the following 
criteria
 - new
 - sufficient description of the invention.
 - no inventiveness in the claimed technical characteristics

and a few examples of software which satisfy the following criteria
 - new
 - sufficient description of the invention.
 - no claimed technical characteristics

Le Samedi 31 Mars 2001 21:39, Pierre Breese a crit :
> > Could you give us an few examples of software which satisfy the following
> > criteria
> > - new
> > - sufficient description of the invention.
> > - inventiveness in the claimed technical characteristics
>
> EP820620B1:ELECTRONIC PAYMENT METHOD FOR PURCHASE-RELATED TRANSACTIONS OVER
> A COMPUTER NETWORK (GC TECH, used under license by KLELINE).
> or
> EP608197B1:Method, as a security concept, against unauthorised use of
> payment means for the cashless  (Ascom)
> pr
> EP755598B1:COMPUTER NETWORK CRYPTOGRAPHIC KEY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM  (Entrust
> technologies)
> etc.
>
> > and a few examples of software which satisfy the following criteria
> > - new
> > - sufficient description of the invention.
> > - no claimed technical characteristics
>
> Not allowalable in Europe...
>
> Pierre BREESE


