From ramon@jl1.quim.ucm.es  Mon Apr  2 08:04:23 2001
From: ramon@jl1.quim.ucm.es (Ram'on Garc'ia Fern'andez)
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:04:23 +0200
Subject: [Patents] French State secretary for Industry against SoftPat
In-Reply-To: <B6EBD056.1266%pb@breese.fr>; from pb@breese.fr on Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 06:20:06PM +0200
References: <Pine.SOL.4.32.0103311513500.18017-100000@igloo.df.lth.se> <B6EBD056.1266%pb@breese.fr>
Message-ID: <20010402090423.B17095@jl1.quim.ucm.es>

On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 06:20:06PM +0200, Pierre Breese wrote:
> Simply the usual criteria of patentability : novelty and inventiveness of
> the claimed technical characteristics, sufficiency of the description of the
> invention.

So are you in favour of the patentability of easy ideas that have no
significant effort behind?

Ramon


