[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: jean-paul.smets@mines.org (Jean-Paul Smets)
- Subject: [Patents] French State secretary for Industry against SoftPat
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:00:11 +0200
Le Dimanche 1 Avril 2001 14:36, Pierre Breese a écrit :
> le 01/04/2001 07:45, Jean-Paul Smets à jean-paul.smets@mines.org a écrit :
> > You probably did not read my email. Could you please read it again.
>
> Dear Jean-Paul,
>
> For sure, you are a brilliant guy, but, please, do not considere that you
> can trap me with such vicious questions.
>
> In both cases, you asked me to give examples of patents filed for not
> patentable inventions !
Not at all. It is not a vicious question. It is a question which is just
aking you if you can provide examples of innovative software which are not
patentable under the criteria you provided.
JPS.
>
> Best regards
>
> Pierre BREESE
>
> > take any example from the USPTO base or from software you use everyday.
> > Here is the original mail again.
> >
> > Could you give us an few examples of software which satisfy the following
> > criteria
> > - new
> > - sufficient description of the invention.
> > - no inventiveness in the claimed technical characteristics
> >
> > and a few examples of software which satisfy the following criteria
> > - new
> > - sufficient description of the invention.
> > - no claimed technical characteristics
>
> _______________________________________________
> Patents maillist - Patents@liberte.aful.org
> http://liberte.aful.org/mailman/listinfo/patents
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)