[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'mva@df.lth.se' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)


On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Gregory Aharonian wrote:

> >According to our view, any harmonizations of the patent systems should
> >not take the form of binding treaties but only of voluntary consent
> >papers and memoranda of understanding between patent administrations.
>
> Which of course is not harmonization.

Harmonization can take many forms, IMHO it is just about making two (or
more) systems more equal the way that they function and making the systems
interoperate.

Does anyone have a good definition of harmonization?

Martin






(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)