[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: phm@a2e.de (PILCH Hartmut)
- Subject: [Patents] EPO patent on challenge & response authentification
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 00:57:45 +0200 (CEST)
Under
http://swpat.ffii.org/vreji/pikta/txt/ep/0427/465/
the EPO awarded ownership of the principle of challenge and response
cryptography to AT&T.
To infringe on the patent, you need to construct a system for
authentification where the key (smartcard) sends a string to
the gate (authentication device) and the latter sends back a testing
number (challenge). Both key and gate have two secret algorithms
that allow them to produce a response that can then be compared.
The patent also teaches that you can prevent the eavesdropper from
guessing the hidden algorithm by introducing a minimum time interval
between two information exchanges and by using long numbers.
So far I had the impression that crypto patents contain some fairly
non-trivial mathematics and are thus likely to be under-represented
in our horror gallery. But that impression may be wrong. At least this
AT&T patent seems to deserve some special honorary place. Or did I
overlook anything?
-phm
_______________________________________________
Swpat mailing list
Swpat@ffii.org
http://ffii.org/mailman/listinfo/swpat
- [Patents] EPO patent on challenge & response authentification, PILCH Hartmut
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)