From pb@breese.fr  Mon May  7 22:26:11 2001
From: pb@breese.fr (Pierre Breese)
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 23:26:11 +0200
Subject: [Patents] consultation questions
In-Reply-To: <20010507170901.C13825@john-edwin-tobey.org>
Message-ID: <B71CDF93.1863%pb@breese.fr>

=20
>=20
> I have read the claims, and they are indeed obvious to anyone
> moderately experienced in Web programming.  Looking for prior art and
> demostrating nullity is an exercise for lawyers.  The patent simply
> contains nothing interesting or surprising to a programmer.
>=20
> Admit that there are bad patents, and I'll admit that there are better
> ones than Amazon's.
>=20
I repeat that I'm not able to proclaim that Amazon's claims are obvious or
not without an objective and serious analyze. But may be you are right. And
if you will forward me the prior art document showing that Amazon claim 1 i=
s
anticipate, I will simply admit that this is a bad patent.



Pierre BREESE  pb@breese.fr
BREESE MAJEROWICZ 3, avenue de l'op=E9ra 75001 PARIS
T=E9l. 0147036777  Fax 0147036778  http://www.breese.fr




