From gepicaam@cybercable.fr  Tue May  8 20:13:41 2001
From: gepicaam@cybercable.fr (gepicaam)
Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 21:13:41 +0200
Subject: [Patents] consultation questions
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105082050520.20184-100000@mulix.oas.a2e.de>
Message-ID: <B71E1205.18DA%gepicaam@cybercable.fr>

> Or maybe about Art 52(2) EPC, implying that the EPO is granting patents on
> subject matter that is according to the written law not patentable.  This
> is what has been at the center of the public debate recently.
> 
Maybe. It seems, you also agree that this wording is ambiguous ? This will
not help the clarification of the situation. But I'm personally confident in
a status quo decision...

Pierre BREESE



