[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: kodama@netcourrier.com (kodama@netcourrier.com)
- Subject: [Patents] American Inventor Coalition / was Re: Software and
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 14:17:35 +0200 (MET DST)
>> I am sorry: this questions is intentionaly provoking, but the fact is t=
hat the
>> business is ruled by investissors, not by software designers.
>> Again, I am not telling that this is a good thing (I simply do not know=
=21), but according
>> to this matter of fact, software patents are necessary.
>
>Sorry, you have no proof of what you claim, and facts are against > you.
Please stop this kind of arguments: there no evidences of your point of vi=
ew, neither.
(quotation of articles are no evidence, for me)
> Before 1985, there were no SW patents even in the USA, and investors > d=
id not give
1) Just before that, there were SW patents... but there were not clearly l=
abelled as =22SW patents=22.
2) The importance of SW were not as important in 85 as it is in 2001.
In 85, it was another world, and there were very few B2B negociations, com=
pared with today.
3) Investissment is much more higher today than in 85, even if we can not =
tell the influence of patents on this point.
So, I think that the point was fairly relevant.
>> So, what you are wanting, you anti software patents, is to change >> co=
mpletly the world.
> From what I said, it is the pro-sw-patents that want to change the
> existing situation...
Coming back to a 25y.o situation is, from my point of view, a drastic chan=
ge =21
>The very point is: =22is it better to give more power to some > > individ=
uals rather than to spread it to the community ?=22.
You are re-writing the things in very personal way. I won't subscribe: yo=
ur wording is not proven to be equivalent to what was in the previous mess=
age.
>Since the Bessen+Maskin study shows that this concentration has no
>benefit, then it is no use dissipating energy (=3D money) in the sw > pat=
ent system...
It is not your money =21=21 =
Since SW business wants to spend (or waste, if you prefer this word) its m=
oney in SW patents, just let it do =21
Again, by =22SW business=22, I do not mean =22software designer=22 but man=
agers. And not some un-informed start-up managers neither (even if Mr. Bre=
ese told that some were informed and meeting him)
S.C.
----- La messagerie itin=E9rante sans abonnement NetCourrier -----
Web: www.netcourrier.com - Minitel : 3615 NETCOURRIER
T=E9l=E9phone: 08 36 69 00 21
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)