[Patents] American Inventor Coalition / was Re: Software and

[kodama@netcourrier.com (kodama@netcourrier.com)]

>> Please stop this kind of arguments: there no evidences of your >> point=
 of view, neither.
>> (quotation of articles are no evidence, for me)

>Whether swpat are useful or not will never be proved formally. The

Isn't it what I told before ??

I really think you miss objectivness, Mr. Lang.
I didn't refute studies of other people and am ready to argue about them b=
ut assess just that they can not be invoked as evidence. =

That is all, and that is no different to your own  statement.

It is the second time you call members to ignore my mails. But in the name=
 of what ? Is it your understand of liberty ?
It is obvious that our position are different, and that I am less extremis=
t that your are, in the amending of current laws/practice.

But your behaviour goes far beyond the normal behaviour of people arguing =
their point of view, and is purely inacceptable in a civilized world =21

Of course, you can put my address in your black list, and I will really re=
spect your position, but please respect other people's liberty to decide w=
hat to do.  =

I think that if people were not interested to reply, they wouldn't have do=
ne so.  I really can not understand your position, and of course accept it=
. =


Except if you want to act as a moderator of this list: In this case, it wo=
uld be have been clearly simpler (and more polite and civilized) to stop p=
osting.



>  All intangible good are a form of expression, and obey different
> economic laws (no marginal costs) than material goods.

I wonder why in the same message, you put in front of me some arguments, a=
nd tell to ignore me. To whom are you talking to ?
Are other members ot the list not already informed of your recurent argume=
nt ??

SC


----- La messagerie itin=E9rante sans abonnement NetCourrier -----
Web: www.netcourrier.com - Minitel : 3615 NETCOURRIER
T=E9l=E9phone: 08 36 69 00 21