[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: lsjbjt@ozemail.com.au (Lachlan S. James)
Subject: [Patents] Non-obviousness/Inventive Step
Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 19:35:38 +1000

What is the test for "non-obviousness" or "inventive step"??
(Semantics! 'A rose is a rose' ...; just depends if you come from the
U.S., Australia, Canada, the UK, NZ, etc.)

Lachlan
(Sydney, Australia)

[Patents] Non-obviousness/Inventive Step, Lachlan S. James

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)