[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: epa98@doc.ic.ac.uk (Edward Avis)
- Subject: [Patents] Philosophers!
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 09:30:18 +0100 (BST)
On Thu, 10 May 2001 patents-request@liberte.aful.org wrote:
> 5. European arguing for patenting pure math formulas (Gregory Aharonian)
>From: Gregory Aharonian <srctran@world.std.com>
>Subject: [Patents] European arguing for patenting pure math formulas
>
> As an antidote to some of the non-scientific thinking appearing
>here, what follows are the abstract, and one paragraph from the
>conclusion, of a journal article from a European philosopher that pure
>mathematical algorithms should be patentable,
Since when were philosophers the people to ask when deciding matters of
economic policy?
Show me a report from an economist that argues it would be beneficial,
on balance, to grant patent monopolies on mathematical discoveries and
algorithms.
Also, I don't think any set of arguments is more 'scientific' than
another. Matters of government policy are not usually decided in a
'scientific' manner; they necessarily involve compromise.
--
Ed Avis
epa98@doc.ic.ac.uk
- [Patents] Philosophers!, Edward Avis
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)