[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: seth.johnson@realmeasures.dyndns.org (Seth Johnson)
- Subject: [Patents] Re: Gene patents compared to software patents....
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:59:22 -0400
That's pretty succinct!
Very well put.
Seth Johnson
Committee for Independent Technology
Fredrik Ohrstrom wrote:
>
> The result is that software patents are affecting my hobby and
> therefor my private life. No other patent have done that before.
> Most people know the problems with software patents: overly broad,
> difficult to categorize, too many and that reinvention is VERY
> common. All of this makes it essentially impossible for me to
> know if I have violated any patents after a nice afternoon
> programming my pet projects. This scares me!
- [Patents] 80000 signatures for software patent free Europe, PILCH Hartmut
- [Patents] Re: 80000 signatures for software patent free Europe,
Ronald J Riley
- [Patents] Re: 80,000 signatures for software patent free Europe,
Seth Johnson
- [Patents] Re: 80000 signatures for software patent free Europe,
PILCH Hartmut
- Message not available
- [Patents] Re: 80,000 signatures for software patent free Europe,
Ronald J Riley
- [Patents] Re: 80,000 signatures for software patent free Europe,
Tim Jackson
- [Patents] Gene patents compared to software patents....,
Fredrik Ohrstrom
- Message not available
- [Patents] Re: Gene patents compared to software patents...., Seth Johnson
- [Patents] Re: 80,000 signatures,
Nick Fleming
- [Patents] Re: 80,000 signatures for software patent free Europe,
Ram'on Garc'ia Fern'andez
- [Patents] Re: 80,000 signatures for software patent free Europe,
Rik van Riel
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)