From phm@a2e.de  Thu Jul 12 21:26:55 2001
From: phm@a2e.de (PILCH Hartmut)
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 22:26:55 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [Patents] Patnews on Pierret
In-Reply-To: <200107121929.PAA07510@world.std.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107122223580.5931-100000@mulix.oas.a2e.de>

Greg trolls:

> > Economic arguments for/against weak/strong protection of IP crucially
> >depend on the nature of the industry.
>
> I agree.  Which is why I keep on arguing that the patentability of
> hardware and the patentability of software should be equivalent, both
> for the logical legal reasons, and for the economic reasons that
> increasingly the use and exploitation of IP in hardware and software
> is the same, for example, in a world of hardware/software codesign
> tools.

1 the question is not about similarity of IP use but similarity of
  IP effects on innovation
2 hardware is not patentable according to European law
  only technical inventions are

[ lemming march prophesies and other bragging deleted ]

--
Hartmut Pilch                                           http://phm.ffii.org/
Protecting Innovation against Patent Inflation	      http://swpat.ffii.org/
80000 signatures against software patents         http://www.noepatents.org/



