[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: phm@a2e.de (PILCH Hartmut)
- Subject: [Patents] Patnews on Pierret
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 22:26:55 +0200 (CEST)
Greg trolls:
> > Economic arguments for/against weak/strong protection of IP crucially
> >depend on the nature of the industry.
>
> I agree. Which is why I keep on arguing that the patentability of
> hardware and the patentability of software should be equivalent, both
> for the logical legal reasons, and for the economic reasons that
> increasingly the use and exploitation of IP in hardware and software
> is the same, for example, in a world of hardware/software codesign
> tools.
1 the question is not about similarity of IP use but similarity of
IP effects on innovation
2 hardware is not patentable according to European law
only technical inventions are
[ lemming march prophesies and other bragging deleted ]
--
Hartmut Pilch http://phm.ffii.org/
Protecting Innovation against Patent Inflation http://swpat.ffii.org/
80000 signatures against software patents http://www.noepatents.org/
- [Patents] Patnews on Pierret, (continued)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)