[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: pgeller@rcf.usc.edu (Paul Edward Geller)
- Subject: [Patents] Re: [FYI] 16% Increase in EPO Filings
- Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 14:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, PILCH Hartmut wrote:
[...]
>
> Technical inventions occur between an abstract idea and its
> materialisation. When you write computer programs or design hardware with
> co-design tools, there is nothing inventive between the abstract idea and
> its materialisation. However, when you write a chemical formula (which is
> an abstract idea), you have not solved any problem. The work is in making
> a reaction actually work the way you conceived it.
>
The word "between" here is ambiguous. How much "materialisation"
must show up in the patent disclosure? What we in the U.S. call the "best
mode" for making and/or using the invention? To what degree must the
patent applicant specify actual materials, conditions of use, etc.?
Cordially, Paul
http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~pgeller/
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)