[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Jim Bessen" <jbessen@researchoninnovation.org (Jim Bessen)
Subject: [Patents] Is it worth improving PTO quality?
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 12:11:24 -0400

Another interesting paper by Mark Lemley:

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=261400

He examines arguments for spending resources improving PTO quality in the
US. He concludes that they are probably not worth it. I am not sure I agree
with all his arguments, but the implication seems to be that this is not an
effective way to solve the current patent problems.

Jim Bessen

[Patents] Is it worth improving PTO quality?, <jbessen@researchoninnovation.org (Jim Bessen)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Patents] Is it worth improving PTO quality?, Gregory Aharonian

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)