From phm@a2e.de  Mon Nov 19 17:52:27 2001
From: phm@a2e.de (PILCH Hartmut)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 18:52:27 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [Patents] patents on ITU-proposals (g.723.1)
In-Reply-To: <200111191811.NAA09012@world.std.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111191849200.6654-100000@mulix.oas.a2e.de>

> Sorry, but if you are going to assert such unsubstantiated reasoning,
> you leave me no choice but to point out to that most people on both
> sides of the atlantic, that most clear concepts of technical invention
> include software patents.  I like the thought that software turns a
> general purpose machine into a specific purpose machine, the
> combination of which always achieves a technical effect.

There is only one concept of technical invention, i.e. the one elaborated
in most detail by German courts in the 70/80s.  Considerations of
"technical effect" have no place in that concept.

Judging from your earlier writings I had thought you had made some
progress, but I must withdraw that conclusion, I fear.

For reading on "technical invention", refer to

	http://swpat.ffii.org/stidi/korcu/

-- 
Hartmut Pilch                                         http://phm.ffii.org/
Protecting Innovation against Patent Inflation	    http://swpat.ffii.org/
95000 signatures against software patents       http://www.noepatents.org/





