[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: dmarti@zgp.org (Don Marti)
Subject: [Patents] US court says publishing DeCSS is legal
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 15:55:13 -0800

begin Philippe Coulonges quotation of Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 12:23:18AM -0500:

> That decision was right, there are no ideas disclosed in object codes.

There are no ideas disclosed in gzipped files.

There are no ideas disclosed in assembly language listings for a
CPU whose assembly language I don't know.

--
Don Marti          What do we want?  Free Dmitry!  When do we want it?  Now!
http://zgp.org/~dmarti
dmarti@zgp.org                                  Free the web, burn all GIFs.
                                                     http://burnallgifs.org/

[Patents] US court says publishing DeCSS is legal, Bernard Lang
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Patents] US court says publishing DeCSS is legal, Gregory Aharonian
  - [Patents] US court says publishing DeCSS is legal, Philippe Coulonges
    - [Patents] US court says publishing DeCSS is legal, Don Marti
      - [Patents] US court says publishing DeCSS is legal, Rik van Riel
    - [Patents] object code., Nick Fleming
      - [Patents] Re: object code., Philippe Coulonges
        
        [Patents] Re: object code., Bernard Lang

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)