[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: mattias.lundstrom@digitalroute.com (Mattias Lundström)
- Subject: [Patents] Alert: Software Patents in Europe: Juridical Coup at the EPO
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 11:05:30 +0100
Seth Johnson wrote:
...
> [2] New EPO examination rules for software -
> http://www.epo.co.at/legal/ gui_lines/f/c_iv_2.htm
...
Slightly broken link, but works without the space.
For an english version see
http://www.european-patent-office.org/legal/gui_lines/e/c_iv_2.htm
Critical extract from the new EPO guidelines:
> In the practice of examining computer-implemented inventions, however,
> it may be more appropriate for the examiner to proceed directly to the
> questions of novelty and inventive step, without considering beforehand
> the question of technical character. In assessing whether there is an
> inventive step, the examiner must establish an objective technical
> problem which has been overcome (see IV, 9.5). The solution of that problem
> constitutes the invention's technical contribution to the art. The presence
> of such a technical contribution establishes that the claimed
> subject-matter
> has a technical character and therefore is indeed an invention within the
> meaning of Art. 52(1).
The EPO has finally gone all the way towards completely ignoring the
software exception in 52.2c.
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)