[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org (Seth Johnson)
- Subject: [Patents] more inflammatory speeches from Greg
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 06:08:41 -0500
I think I got it the first time!
:-)
Seth Johnson
PILCH Hartmut wrote:
>
> Here is a version with some confusing grammatical errors corrected:
>
> The German Constitutional Court (BVerfG) has extended the notion of
> "property rights" granted by art 14 of the Basic Law (GG, constitution) to
> include all kinds of immaterial titles, including copyright and patents.
>
> This enlarged property concept is awkward and outrageous at first sight,
> but in fact has some advantages, because it allows a view on how property
> is acquired and limited. Patents, like other property titles, according
> to this, need to be granted according to the principle of "social
> responsibility of property", and since copyright has been found to be the
> adequate legal rule for acquiring software property, nobody has the right
> to introduce software patents (which void copyright property and thus
> violate art 14 GG) without a change of law which takes the social
> responsibility and limitations of property etc into account and thus bring
> considerations to bear that eventually destroy the playground of semi law
> experts such as patent lawyers (or patent busters), who until now were
> acting in a legal (or "science and logic") world of their own.
>
> ...
>
> Copyright covers everything that individualises a work and makes it
> attributable to a creator, be it expression or not. In the sense that
> copyright property extends only to the individualised aspects of the work,
> it fullfills the requirements of what people would call natural rights.
> If there are any such rights, the author's right to his work (i.e. to the
> individual aspects that distinguish it from the works of others) is one of
> them. Being such, its violation by software patents cannot be treated
> lightly.
>
> --
> Hartmut Pilch http://phm.ffii.org/
> Protecting Innovation against Patent Inflation http://swpat.ffii.org/
> 95000 signatures against software patents http://www.noepatents.org/
- [Patents] more inflammatory speeches from Greg, (continued)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)