[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: jtobey@john-edwin-tobey.org (John Tobey)
- Subject: [Patents] Very basic patent question
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 22:02:56 -0500
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 03:10:02AM +0100, Erik Moeller wrote:
> if a company holds a patent on an essential technology, and another
> company wants to be active in the same field, can the other company
> sue the patent-holder to get the patent declared invalid, before
> starting to work on an actual product, or does it have to be sued by
> the patent-holding company to get the patent contested in court?
I suspect that the answer to this varies by jurisdiction, but here is
an excerpt from a submission by Daniel Maddux to the W3C patent
discussion forum which may shed light on the U.S. situation:
The cost of invalidating a patent versus licensing the patent may
be an issue. An ex parte Reexamination Request currently has a
filing fee of US$2,520.00 (see the United States Patent and
Trademark Office website at
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/qs/ope/1999/fee20011001.htm
and look under Miscellaneous Patent Fees). Inter partes
Reexamination would be more expensive, US$8,800.00. Attorney fees
for filing a Reexamination Request would be roughly comparable to
negotiating a RAND License or obtaining an Infringement Opinion
for designing around the patent. In addition, the W3C or others
can petition the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks to
reexamine a patent on his/her own initiative, which would reduce
the cost of reexamining the patent to 0. Attorney fees for
pursuing a Declaratory Judgment action to invalidate a patent
would definitely be more expensive, provided the case went to
trial. However, a patent owner may choose to settle and RF
license the patent rather than face the uncertainty of a trial and
jury verdict. Furthermore, filing a Declaratory Judgment action
would have a deterrent effect on future patent owners not to
unreasonably withhold licensing a patent that reads on a W3C
standard. Since the attorney fees for filing a Reexamination
Request are roughly comparable to licensing or designing around a
patent, and filing Declaratory Judgment actions to invalidate a
patent have a deterrent effect on patent owners who refuse to RF
license their patents, the cost of invalidating a patent versus
licensing a patent may be an issue but does not rule out these
options.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/2001Nov/0014.html
(a very entertaining two-hour read, in my pedantic opinion)
--
John Tobey <jtobey@john-edwin-tobey.org>
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)