[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Luuk van Dijk <lvd@mndmttr.nl>
- To: Xavi Drudis Ferran <xdrudis@tinet.org>
- Cc: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] W3C allowing RAND, but prefering RF
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:19:58 +0100
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 22:13:44 Xavi Drudis Ferran wrote:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/23821.html
> Net patent tax - W3C publishes new advice
> By Andrew Orlowski in San Francisco
> Posted: 25/01/2002 at 09:29 GMT
<SNIP>
>
> It seems to be a statement of current practice, not a new policy.
>
Now where have I heard this before?
People keep telling me that changing EPT art 52 would not be a new
policy, but just confirming current practice. This sounds like the
same strategic trick to me.
It may seem strange that you can change present and past reality
by adopting a statement about it, but then, isn't that the message
of post-modernism?
Luuk van Dijk
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)