[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: "Jozef Halbersztadt" <halber@timsi.pl>
- To: <patents@aful.org>, "Xavi Drudis Ferran" <xdrudis@tinet.org>
- Subject: [Patents] Decision making procedure for the swpat directive
- Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 09:59:57 +0100
>
> It will be a codecision procedure, see:
>
> http://europa.eu.int/prelex/aide.cfm?CL=en&page=procdec#450
>
> It seems the first vote is in the European Parliament by qualified
majority
> (is that 75% ?).
The opinions of the EuroParliament in the co-decision procedure are
adopted by simple majority voting, I think. A qualified majority is
about voting in the Council (heads of governments).
http://europa.eu.int/scadplus/leg/en/cig/g4000q.htm
But the most important for the future of the CEC proposal are open
debates in the EuroParliament and possibility of amendments that can
change everything. I think we should campaign with shorter version of
the FFII counter-proposal.
http://swpat.ffii.org/vreji/papri/eubsa-swpat0202/#prop
We should also demand debate's in Member States parliaments.
Regards
Jozef Halbersztadt
> But even if they reject it, the
> Council (ministers of member states) has a say and may have it voted
again
> in Parliament, this time with simple majority (but absolute majority
for
> ammending it). And it goes on a little more...
>
>
> --
> Xavi Drudis Ferran
> xdrudis@tinet.org
>
>
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)