[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: <xdrudis@tinet.org>
- To: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Article on the codecision procedure
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:30:49 +0100 (CET)
Hello,
since I once pointed to the Treaty art. 251 on codecision procedure,
I'd like to also give this URL of an article that analyses the practical
play between Comission, Council and Parliament and says that the role
of the Parliament is stronger than implied by the Treaty, and
increasingly so, so far. I have no idea about politics, so don't
ask me how accurate this article is, but the idea I get is that
decisions are taken in informal mettings between Council and Parliament
people, more than in formal rounds
or hearings in any of this isntitutions. Not that this is any new,
either.
http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2002-003.htm
The article is long and maybe not imprescindible, so you may want
to skip it if busy. I haven't reached much of a conclusion on how
it affects the best way to contact politicians, except maybe
that don't forget your MEPs. Best would be to talk to state
representatives _and_ MEPs, so that at least they know there's
an issue.
Note: the codecision procedure is the one used to decide on the
directive proposal on software patents.
- Article on the codecision procedure, xdrudis
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)